Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clara Burel vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Burel vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!
Clara Burel vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Burel has won 42.61% of points on his second serve, while Naef has won 48.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Burel, in recent form, has won 58.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 55.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.63% and 39.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Burel has saved 49.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 55.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Burel has won 64.06% of matches played (W/L 41/ 23), with Naef winning 52.63% (W/L 30/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Burel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 74/ 60). Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 23/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Burel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9), where as Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.53% of matches (W/L 23/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Burel winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Burel winning 0 and Naef winning 2. The last match between Burel and Naef was at the Open 35 de Saint-Malo - Saint-Malo, 03-05-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:56.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Burel and Naef have played a deciding set 0 times, with Burel winning 0 times and Naef 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Burel winning 0, and Naef 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Burel has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.02 while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 195.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Burel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Burel has converted 50.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 45.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Burel 0 - 1 Naef
45
Rank
44
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
153
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
59% (162-112)
Career Total W/L
67% (87-42)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
57% (17-13)
$1,267,550
Career Prize Money
$169,770
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clara Burel | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:56 | 1:14:56 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (33/62) | 64% (36/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 64% (23/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (11/29) | 80% (16/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (17/56) | 42% (26/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clara Burel | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 57% (17/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (29/29) | 59% (41/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (272/264) | 56% (349/279) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.51 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 135 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:8 | 1:36:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.13 | 174.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (971/1762) | 61% (1228/2025) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (606/971) | 67% (822/1228) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (332/791) | 48% (384/797) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (111/228) | 45% (122/270) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (855/1839) | 45% (945/2078) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 62% (16/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 57% (17/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/5) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 22% (2/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (13/4) | 8% (12/1) |
Clara Burel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
129)
3
Aces
1
16
Double Faults
7
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
37%
(
20 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
129)
123
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Clara Burel
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
118)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
52%
(
55 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
64 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Clara Burel
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Katarina Zavatska
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Clara Burel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Daria Saville
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Burel Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
